| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
studies [2023/04/20 09:16]
sigridundset |
studies [2023/06/17 08:23] (current)
sigridundset |
| [[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01123.x|2005: Statistical methods for analysing responses of wildlife to human disturbance | [[https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01123.x|2005: Statistical methods for analysing responses of wildlife to human disturbance |
| HAIGANOUSH K. PREISLER, ALAN A. AGER, MICHAEL J. WISDOM]] | HAIGANOUSH K. PREISLER, ALAN A. AGER, MICHAEL J. WISDOM]] |
| | |
| | {{ ::theeconomicvalueofquiet_finalreport.pdf |March 2011: The Economic Value of Quiet, prepared by URS-Scott Wilson for the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)}} |
| | |
| | [[https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article/28/1/133/577113| 2013: Is this the new smoking? An expert panel review of the York University OHV health benefits study]] |
| |
| [[https://www.lsohc.mn.gov/materials/16_Mtg/DEC_14_2016_ORV_WHITE_PAPER_BackcountryHuntersAnglersofAmerica.pdf| 2016: Cumulative and Universal: ATV Impacts on the Landscape and Wildlife; Backcountry Hunters and Anglers.]] | [[https://www.lsohc.mn.gov/materials/16_Mtg/DEC_14_2016_ORV_WHITE_PAPER_BackcountryHuntersAnglersofAmerica.pdf| 2016: Cumulative and Universal: ATV Impacts on the Landscape and Wildlife; Backcountry Hunters and Anglers.]] |
| simplification of avian communities"}} | simplification of avian communities"}} |
| |
| | {{ :studies:winter_rec_science_2021_emailweb.pdf |2021: Environmental Impacts of Winter Recreation; Best Available Science, 2021}} |
| |
| {{ ::st:s41598-023-27670-9.pdf |2023: Partial COVID‑19 closure of a national park reveals negative | {{ ::st:s41598-023-27670-9.pdf |2023: Partial COVID‑19 closure of a national park reveals negative |
| influence of low‑impact recreation on wildlife spatiotemporal ecology; "We found consistent negative effects of human presence on species, regardless of status as large carnivores, meso-carnivores, or herbivores. Based on best-fitting models, 12 of 14 species used a fewer number of sites in the year that the park was open to recreation (Fig. 2). Declines in use of sites were relatively modest but were 10% or greater for 6 of those 12 species (black bear, coyote, elk, lynx, white- tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and wolves"}} | influence of low‑impact recreation on wildlife spatiotemporal ecology; "We found consistent negative effects of human presence on species, regardless of status as large carnivores, meso-carnivores, or herbivores. Based on best-fitting models, 12 of 14 species used a fewer number of sites in the year that the park was open to recreation (Fig. 2). Declines in use of sites were relatively modest but were 10% or greater for 6 of those 12 species (black bear, coyote, elk, lynx, white- tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and wolves"}} |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
