This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
comments_on_mwc_master_plan [2022/09/17 09:06] sigridundset |
comments_on_mwc_master_plan [2022/10/15 13:20] (current) sigridundset |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Comments on MWC Draft Master Plan ====== | ====== Comments on MWC Draft Master Plan ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
| features, how about they clean up the environmental disaster they have already caused." | features, how about they clean up the environmental disaster they have already caused." | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| + | further threaten the Mount' | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | changing and risks to our precious resources increasing, it is more | ||
| + | important than ever to diminish the human stress on the fragile | ||
| + | mountain ecology. Building infrastructure to accommodate guests | ||
| + | on the Cog above the treeline will only add to the risks and | ||
| + | degradation of Mt. Washington' | ||
| - | {{ :mw:cog_railway_proposal_redacted.pdf |}} | + | {{ :mw:save_the_top.pdf |We need to think of for generations not just what income |
| + | we can generate from it. Compared to other areas, what we are doing is a disgrace.}} | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| + | equal, and that the business “success” of the “Summit Partners” is not mandated. The most | ||
| + | important obligation of the Mount Washington Commission is “(d) Protection of the | ||
| + | summit as to its unique flora and other natural resources.” | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||